The Blue House, the presidential office of South Korea, recently denied a local media report that the government was discussing with the United States the inclusion of semiconductor projects as the first investment under its $350 billion commitment to U.S. investment. In a text message statement, the Blue House stated that reports suggesting the two countries were discussing semiconductors as the first strategic investment project were "not true," but declined to provide further details on negotiations between South Korea and the United States regarding the investment commitment.
It is understood that previous reports, citing unnamed officials from the ruling party, indicated that the U.S. side had requested South Korea to prioritize investment in U.S. memory chip production facilities. This has created uncertainty around Seoul’s original plan to announce its first investment project in the United States by the end of this month.
According to reports, this U.S. request was a core topic of discussion at a closed-door trade meeting at Cheong Wa Dae on August 13. Previously, South Korea had prioritized the energy sector as its first major investment project in the United States, but the sudden shift in priorities and additional demands from the U.S. have altered the negotiation landscape.
Most officials in attendance considered it unrealistic to invest in memory chip production facilities in the United States. The primary reason lies in the fact that $Samsung Electronics (005930.KR)$ and $SK hynix (SKHY.US)$ approximately KRW 800 trillion (about USD 580 billion) has already been announced for investment in chips and data centers in the Honam region of southern South Korea. Further large-scale memory investments in the United States could dilute corporate investment capacity and affect the development of South Korea’s domestic semiconductor industry cluster and ecosystem. A source stated, “Memory is a strategic industry for South Korea and must be considered in conjunction with the domestic cluster and semiconductor ecosystem.”
The timing of the formal U.S. request was also quite delicate. In late June, the South Korean government had just announced massive investment plans by Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix in the Honam region. On July 9, U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick publicly named both companies, expressing hope to bring them “to the United States to build production facilities.” Kim Yong-beom, Director of the Policy Coordination Office at Cheong Wa Dae, subsequently responded on social media that “the expansion of wafer fabrication capacity in the Republic of Korea is a national project.” Since then, the memory chip issue has moved from public confrontation to behind-the-scenes negotiations.
Against this backdrop, South Korean Minister of Trade, Industry and Energy Kim Jeong-gwan made an urgent trip to the United States on the 16th, just three weeks after his previous visit. In Washington, Kim stated that South Korea still hopes to announce investment projects between late August and early September, but several specific practical issues have emerged as negotiations enter their final stage. Diplomatic sources analyze that this reflects ongoing disagreements between the two sides regarding project selection, investment scale, and conditions.
A further concern for South Korea is that the delay in announcing investments is reigniting U.S. tariff pressure. Sources indicate that the United States has again mentioned the possibility of restoring higher tariffs on South Korean goods such as automobiles. In January this year, then-President Trump threatened to restore tariffs on South Korean cars from 15% to 25%, citing slow progress in handling the Special Act on Investment in the United States. Pressure eased temporarily after the act was passed in March. Now, with the flagship project still undecided, dissatisfaction on the U.S. side is rising once again.
There are also signs that pressure is spreading into the realm of security cooperation. Follow-up consultations on issues such as the introduction of nuclear-powered submarines for South Korea and revisions to the nuclear energy agreement have stalled; the second meeting, originally scheduled for July in Washington following the initial meeting in Seoul in June, has yet to take place. Senior figures in the ruling party worry that “trade issues are eroding security negotiations,” and if the United States uses security cooperation as leverage, the situation could become even more complex.
Analysts believe that South Korea currently faces a dilemma: on one hand, it needs to announce its first investment project in the United States as soon as possible to demonstrate sincerity and ease overall tensions; on the other hand, continuous additional demands from the United States are simultaneously increasing pressure for commercial viability reviews and domestic industry protection. If handled improperly, not only could negotiations on U.S. investment become protracted, but South Korea-U.S. economic, trade, and security cooperation could also suffer collateral impacts.
Want to select stocks or get a stock diagnosis? Curious about the opportunities and risks in your portfolio? For all your investment questions,Just ask Futubull AI!
Editor/lambor