Which is right and which is wrong in the debate between Huawei and Xiaopeng AEB?

Show Transcript
Tech Talk Nov 8, 2023 15:48 · 12k Views

The translation is provided by third-party software.


The above content is for informational or educational purposes only and does not constitute any investment advice related to EleBank. Although we strive to ensure the truthfulness, accuracy, and originality of all such content, we cannot guarantee it.
Transcript
  • 00:00 Recently, huh, Yu Chengdong of Huawei and He Xiaopeng of Xiaopeng Motors had an aerial battle
  • 00:04 The topic point comes from discussions on AEB. What about He Xiaopeng
  • 00:07 Questioning the content of Huawei AEB was also cheating, while Yu Chengdong questioned that He Xiaopeng didn't understand AEB
  • 00:12 I have to say, Huawei's influence is really huge because AEB was born
  • 00:16 It's probably 20 years younger. It's not a new word or technology in itself
  • 00:20 Well, this kind of airborne conversation has sparked everyone's discussion about AEB
  • 00:24 I found that many industry insiders, including ordinary consumers, were involved in this discussion or war
  • 00:29 They expressed their opinions one after another
  • 00:31 Of course, some opinions from outside the industry aren't necessarily entirely true
  • 00:34 So let's first review what AB is. Its full name is automlance braking literally means autonomous emergency braking
  • 00:41 So why has it been mentioned frequently by consumers in the past two years
  • 00:44 Isn't it because of the rise of adas
  • 00:46 It's an important part of adas, and the threshold is getting lower
  • 00:49 Almost now you can buy a model with AB for 100.1 million
  • 00:53 uh
  • 00:53 At the beginning of AB, it was mainly an active safety configuration for some medium to low speed situations
  • 00:58 For example, what we commonly call ghost probes, or similar operating conditions
  • 01:02 With the development of AEB
  • 01:03 Actually, the current European ENCAP includes the domestic NCAP
  • 01:06 In fact, AEB has detailed standards and regulations. They include how to evaluate emergency braking actions taken on pedestrian bicycles, motorcycles, and vehicles
  • 01:16 But ah, these regulations are all relatively basic
  • 01:20 Mainly used to evaluate test scores
  • 01:22 Until now, AEB doesn't have a fully defined standard
  • 01:26 Or it can be expanded infinitely upwards according to its literal meaning
  • 01:29 So whether to stop at 60 kilometers per hour, or 90 kilometers or 120 kilometers
  • 01:35 Every vendor has their own strategies and ideas
  • 01:37 I also probably read online reviews. There is still a big difference in opinions between ordinary users and car industry insiders
  • 01:44 Generally recognized by consumers
  • 01:45 The knowledge is relatively simple and crude; most of it is entangled at the speed point where AEB works
  • 01:51 I think the higher the speed and the more it stops, then the more effective this system is
  • 01:55 Well, of course it is, because this is the number that most intuitively reflects emergency braking capability
  • 02:00 Well, some engineers and people in the industry have relatively neutral views on AEB
  • 02:04 Even some opinions are contrary to the average consumer
  • 02:08 Engineers usually consider AB's algorithm and how difficult it is to calibrate
  • 02:12 Including predicting clutter, ah, etc., and how to avoid incorrect braking due to incorrect identification
  • 02:17 One interesting phenomenon is that many ordinary people think it would be better to stop by mistake
  • 02:23 Only in this way can safety be guaranteed
  • 02:24 However, in the opinion of people in the automobile industry, the opposite is true. They think it would be better not to brake by mistake
  • 02:30 After all, it is still difficult to achieve 100% accurate object recognition
  • 02:35 I believe many driving friends have also triggered the emergency braking function
  • 02:38 Some have indeed avoided danger
  • 02:40 Some, uh, may have added risk, such as when you are distracted
  • 02:44 If a ghost probe appears, or there is a relatively slow moving vehicle ahead
  • 02:47 AEB can indeed slow down and even avoid collisions
  • 02:50 However, if during intense driving, the driver is fully capable of performing some parallel operations
  • 02:55 But because the system detected that the speed was too fast compared to the vehicle in front
  • 02:58 Then maybe during the process of connecting you will rashly take a braking action
  • 03:02 Instead, it will make your driving dangerous
  • 03:05 Well, there are many other misunderstandings, ah, I don't know if you've experienced them
  • 03:08 So many friends who love driving actually want to turn off AEB
  • 03:12 Judging from the test results, Huawei does have the ability to brake at higher speeds than other manufacturers
  • 03:17 Let's put this situation in actual driving, if you really get carried away
  • 03:21 No action at all
  • 03:22 AEB can indeed avoid collision with the car in front, then what about the rear car
  • 03:26 Once AEB works at high speed, it will inevitably intervene to control the vehicle sooner
  • 03:31 At this time, if the driver takes over and changes lanes, the vehicle often continues to brake at this time
  • 03:36 Then you can't control the vehicle according to the driver's operation; on the contrary, it will increase the risk by one more time
  • 03:40 Well, this is a point mentioned by many engineers, I don't know if you can get my points
  • 03:44 That's why many automotive engineers aren't too excited about this AEB discussion by Huawei
  • 03:49 They are more trying to convince everyone through some calibrated strategies and ideas
  • 03:54 Also, I think many people have overlooked one point, that is, any assisted driving behavior in vehicles now requires people to take the lead
  • 04:01 not a machine
  • 04:02 It seems that when everyone is discussing this issue, it seems like people have lost their hands and feet
  • 04:08 At least now, AEB can only be considered a secondary safety configuration
  • 04:12 There won't be any answers to this debate, because AEB's standards are inherently vague
  • 04:15 Every manufacturer also has their own understanding of calibration, and I don't think there's anything wrong with He Xiaopeng's understanding of AEB
  • 04:21 But if you say they cheated, they shouldn't have, right
  • 04:23 But what
  • 04:24 It is undeniable that Huawei's ability to recognize scenes like this is indeed superior to other products
  • 04:30 Including Volvo, which surpassed the first promotion of city safety aeb features
  • 04:35 Later, we actually also wanted to have some in-depth communication with PhDs, including UMC, these manufacturers that specialize in ADAS or AEB calibrations
  • 04:44 Check out their AEB strategies and ideas
  • 04:48 So what is your opinion on this matter
  • 04:50 Welcome to leave a message in the comment area